Timing glyphosate just right can make or break a crop. But is that a warning sign? This article questions our harvest dependency and explores what’s next.
New Zealand’s organic sector just hit $1.18 billion. But behind the headlines lies a troubling truth: our policies aren’t keeping pace—and glyphosate is still on the menu.
All major political parties in New Zealand have been noticeably silent on MPI’s plan to raise glyphosate residue limits. But the Greens’ silence is especially deafening.
Tobacco once came with doctor endorsements. Today, it comes with warnings. Could glyphosate follow the same path? With mounting lawsuits and global concern, it’s a question worth asking.
MPI claims glyphosate residues are being monitored—but the last published test was over a decade ago. Where’s the data? And why should we believe the reassurance?
Organic farmers are doing everything right — but that doesn’t stop glyphosate from blowing in. When drift and legacy contamination strike, clean farming becomes a moving target.
Leaked documents show the EPA overlooked internal warnings linking glyphosate to cancer. If it happened there, what does it mean for New Zealand’s MRL changes?
Glyphosate isn’t just used to kill weeds—it’s sprayed on food crops right before harvest to dry them faster. Europe has banned it. So why is NZ doubling down?
