Kapiti Coast District Council has provided details of herbicide use across public spaces, including parks, reserves, footpaths, sports fields, tracks, trails, and ecological restoration sites. The response includes application information, policy references, and an extensive chemical inventory supplied through the Council Herbicide Transparency Project.

The Council Herbicide Transparency Project examines how New Zealand councils manage herbicide use in parks, reserves, roadsides, sports fields, and other public spaces. Using official information requests, the project builds a nationwide public record of spraying practices, policies, product use, and review processes.

Most people would never knowingly add a toxic substance to someone else's food. Yet modern societies routinely accept risks that would alarm many people if viewed in isolation. This article explores Ulrich Beck's Risk Society theory and how invisible risks, fragmented responsibility, and normalisation can make harmful systems feel ordinary.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has launched an investigation into glyphosate residues in food products marketed to families and children. The move raises an important question for New Zealand: if a major U.S. state believes this issue deserves scrutiny, why aren't similar questions being asked here?

Following the publication of independent glyphosate testing results for selected Weet-Bix products, No More Glyphosate NZ contacted Sanitarium for comment. This page reproduces the company's response in full, allowing readers to review Sanitarium's position on food safety, regulatory compliance, supplier standards, and glyphosate residues for themselves.

When regulators describe a chemical as "safe," they are not necessarily saying it is risk-free or incapable of causing harm. This article explores what safety means in regulatory science, how exposure limits are established, and why consumers and regulators sometimes view risk very differently. Understanding that distinction may change the way you interpret safety claims about glyphosate and other chemicals.

Glyphosate is frequently described as one of the most studied herbicides ever developed. Yet scientific understanding evolves. This article examines whether modern concerns about microbiome health, hormone disruption, cumulative exposure, and developmental effects were the same questions researchers were asking when many current safety standards were established.

Recent discussions about glyphosate residues in food highlight an important question: should consumers simply trust existing regulations, or should they have access to independent testing data so they can make their own informed decisions? This article explores the difference between regulatory compliance, personal risk tolerance, and the growing demand for transparency in the food supply.

An Auckland family’s concerns about herbicide spraying near their child’s school have raised broader questions about glyphosate use, parent notification, and transparency around chemical spraying in New Zealand schools.

Why did the gluten-free Weet-Bix sample return the highest glyphosate result in our independent testing? This article explores Australian sorghum, differing agricultural practices, trans-Tasman food regulations, and the growing gap between health branding and chemical transparency.

No More Glyphosate NZ has published an open letter to Sanitarium Health and Wellbeing Company following independent glyphosate residue testing of selected Weet-Bix products. The letter questions whether legal compliance alone is enough for foods marketed around wholegrain health, wellbeing, and trust.

Terms like NOAEL, ADI, and “safe exposure limits” appear constantly in discussions about pesticides, food residues, and environmental health. But what do these regulatory concepts actually mean — and what are their limitations? This article explores how NOAELs are established, why study design matters, and why evolving science is raising new questions about long-term chemical exposure and safety assessment.

As resistant weeds spread across modern agriculture, farming systems are increasingly relying on combinations of herbicides rather than single-chemical approaches. A new study examining glyphosate alongside dicamba and 2,4-D raises broader questions about mixture toxicology, gut health, chronic low-dose exposure, and whether current safety testing models fully reflect real-world agricultural exposure patterns.

Herbicide resistance may be more than a weed-control problem. This series explores monocultures, biological adaptation, technological escalation, and the growing tension between efficiency and resilience in modern farming systems.

Herbicide resistance is often framed as an agricultural problem. But what if it reflects a much larger pattern? From antibiotics to fungicides and pesticides, modern systems repeatedly face the same challenge: biology adapts. This article explores the growing tension between human control systems, chemical dependence, and long-term resilience.

Modern agriculture increasingly rewards simplification, efficiency, and scale. But could highly simplified farming systems also become more vulnerable over time? This article explores crop rotation, monocultures, herbicide resistance, and the growing tension between efficiency and long-term resilience in modern farming.

Herbicide resistance is usually discussed inside crop paddocks. But what if some of the strongest resistance pressures are developing outside them — along fence lines, roadsides, drains, rail corridors, and other repeatedly sprayed non-crop areas?

Precision agriculture promises smarter, more sustainable farming through AI-guided spraying, drones, and precision targeting. But is modern agriculture becoming less chemically dependent — or simply more efficient at maintaining it?

A new 2025 study suggests glyphosate and urea fertilizers may interact in ways that alter soil nitrogen cycling, microbial communities, and nitrogen availability. Could modern farming systems be creating hidden long-term soil challenges beneath the surface?

Independent laboratory testing of six Weet-Bix-style breakfast cereal products found four below the laboratory reporting limit, while two Australian-made Sanitarium products returned detectable glyphosate residues — including one result of 3.9 mg/kg.