Independent glyphosate testing only happens because of community support and public donations. Donate here.
Kaipara District Council Herbicide Use and Public Space Spraying
As part of the Council Herbicide Transparency Project, Kaipara District Council outlined the herbicides used in parks, reserves, gardens, and roadsides, including application frequencies, contractor requirements, and review processes.
Ōtorohanga District Council Herbicide Use and Public Space Spraying
As part of the Council Herbicide Transparency Project, Ōtorohanga District Council confirmed the use of glyphosate and Conquest in parks, reserves, and cemeteries, with reviews occurring during contract renewals.
The Missing Piece in the Glyphosate Debate: Your Gut Microbiome
As microbiome research grows, some scientists are asking whether chemicals like glyphosate could influence the gut bacteria that play important roles in human health.
New Plymouth District Council Herbicide Use and Public Space Spraying
New Plymouth District Council has provided information on herbicide use across parks, reserves, sports grounds, and gardens. The council confirmed the use of the glyphosate-based product Knock Out 360 and highlighted a range of non-chemical weed-management methods, including mulching, mowing, companion planting, integrated pest management, and eco-certified alternatives.
South Wairarapa District Council Herbicide Use and Public Space Spraying
South Wairarapa District Council has provided details of herbicide use across public spaces, including streets, parks, reserves, sports fields, and hard-edge areas. The response identifies glyphosate as the council's primary herbicide and includes a detailed Standard Operating Procedure covering safety, environmental protections, signage requirements, and operational controls.
Kapiti Coast District Council Herbicide Use and Public Space Spraying
Kapiti Coast District Council has provided details of herbicide use across public spaces, including parks, reserves, footpaths, sports fields, tracks, trails, and ecological restoration sites. The response includes application information, policy references, and an extensive chemical inventory supplied through the Council Herbicide Transparency Project.
Council Herbicide Transparency Project
The Council Herbicide Transparency Project examines how New Zealand councils manage herbicide use in parks, reserves, roadsides, sports fields, and other public spaces. Using official information requests, the project builds a nationwide public record of spraying practices, policies, product use, and review processes.
Risk Society: Why Do We Accept Chemicals in Our Food?
Most people would never knowingly add a toxic substance to someone else's food. Yet modern societies routinely accept risks that would alarm many people if viewed in isolation. This article explores Ulrich Beck's Risk Society theory and how invisible risks, fragmented responsibility, and normalisation can make harmful systems feel ordinary.
If Texas Is Investigating Glyphosate in Food, Why Isn’t New Zealand?
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has launched an investigation into glyphosate residues in food products marketed to families and children. The move raises an important question for New Zealand: if a major U.S. state believes this issue deserves scrutiny, why aren't similar questions being asked here?
Sanitarium Responds to Independent Weet-Bix Glyphosate Testing
Following the publication of independent glyphosate testing results for selected Weet-Bix products, No More Glyphosate NZ contacted Sanitarium for comment. This page reproduces the company's response in full, allowing readers to review Sanitarium's position on food safety, regulatory compliance, supplier standards, and glyphosate residues for themselves.
Safe According to Whom? What Regulators Mean When They Say a Chemical Is Safe
When regulators describe a chemical as "safe," they are not necessarily saying it is risk-free or incapable of causing harm. This article explores what safety means in regulatory science, how exposure limits are established, and why consumers and regulators sometimes view risk very differently. Understanding that distinction may change the way you interpret safety claims about glyphosate and other chemicals.
Glyphosate Is One of the Most Studied Herbicides in the World. Studied for What?
Glyphosate is frequently described as one of the most studied herbicides ever developed. Yet scientific understanding evolves. This article examines whether modern concerns about microbiome health, hormone disruption, cumulative exposure, and developmental effects were the same questions researchers were asking when many current safety standards were established.
Informed Choice or Blind Trust? Why Glyphosate Testing Matters
Recent discussions about glyphosate residues in food highlight an important question: should consumers simply trust existing regulations, or should they have access to independent testing data so they can make their own informed decisions? This article explores the difference between regulatory compliance, personal risk tolerance, and the growing demand for transparency in the food supply.
One Parent Asked What Was Being Sprayed at Their Child’s School. The Answer Was “Similar to Roundup.”
An Auckland family’s concerns about herbicide spraying near their child’s school have raised broader questions about glyphosate use, parent notification, and transparency around chemical spraying in New Zealand schools.
Why Was the Gluten-Free Weet-Bix Result So High?
Why did the gluten-free Weet-Bix sample return the highest glyphosate result in our independent testing? This article explores Australian sorghum, differing agricultural practices, trans-Tasman food regulations, and the growing gap between health branding and chemical transparency.
An Open Letter to Sanitarium Health and Wellbeing Company
No More Glyphosate NZ has published an open letter to Sanitarium Health and Wellbeing Company following independent glyphosate residue testing of selected Weet-Bix products. The letter questions whether legal compliance alone is enough for foods marketed around wholegrain health, wellbeing, and trust.
No Observed Adverse Effect Level: What Does It Actually Mean?
Terms like NOAEL, ADI, and “safe exposure limits” appear constantly in discussions about pesticides, food residues, and environmental health. But what do these regulatory concepts actually mean — and what are their limitations? This article explores how NOAELs are established, why study design matters, and why evolving science is raising new questions about long-term chemical exposure and safety assessment.
Glyphosate, Dicamba, and 2,4-D: The Chemical Cocktail Problem
As resistant weeds spread across modern agriculture, farming systems are increasingly relying on combinations of herbicides rather than single-chemical approaches. A new study examining glyphosate alongside dicamba and 2,4-D raises broader questions about mixture toxicology, gut health, chronic low-dose exposure, and whether current safety testing models fully reflect real-world agricultural exposure patterns.
Resistance, Resilience, and the Future of Farming
Herbicide resistance may be more than a weed-control problem. This series explores monocultures, biological adaptation, technological escalation, and the growing tension between efficiency and resilience in modern farming systems.
The Resistance Cycle: When Biology Adapts to Human Control Systems
Herbicide resistance is often framed as an agricultural problem. But what if it reflects a much larger pattern? From antibiotics to fungicides and pesticides, modern systems repeatedly face the same challenge: biology adapts. This article explores the growing tension between human control systems, chemical dependence, and long-term resilience.


