If you’re here, you probably care about making your voice heard — and with the proposal to increase glyphosate residue limits in New Zealand, now is the time to speak up. But how do you make sure your submission doesn’t just get filed away without a second glance?
It’s easier than you think. Whether you’re writing from the heart or citing scientific studies, there are a few simple strategies that will help your submission stand out.
Submissions closed Friday, 16 May at 5 pm
However, the petition is open until 22 May
Sign the petition (click) here!
Stay informed, sign up to receive our newsletter!
Submitting your feedback is simple — it doesn’t need to be sophisticated!
1) Send your email to: ACVM.Consultation@mpi.govt.nz
2) Answer these two basic questions:
- Do you agree or disagree with the proposed changes?
- Do you agree or disagree with the proposed MRL (Maximum Residue Level) values?
Step 1: Know Your Goal
First things first — be clear about what you want to achieve. In this case, it’s simple:
You want New Zealand regulators to reject the proposal to increase allowable glyphosate residues on food.
Start with this statement upfront. Be direct and confident. You don’t need to write an essay — just clearly state your position.
Example Opening Line:
“I oppose the proposed increase in glyphosate residue levels on food crops and urge the Ministry for Primary Industries to reject the changes.”
Step 2: Personalize Your Message
One of the most common mistakes is submitting a form letter or a generic statement. While these do add numbers, personal stories carry more weight. Share why this issue matters to you personally.
- Have you noticed changes in your health or your family’s health related to food quality?
- Are you concerned about the long-term impacts on children, wildlife, or the environment?
- Do you want to see New Zealand leading the way on clean, safe food standards?
These personal touches make your submission more relatable and memorable.
Step 3: Back It Up
Facts are your friends — but only use reliable sources. Referencing credible studies, official reports, or expert opinions strengthens your argument.
Here are some points you might include:
- The World Health Organization’s classification of glyphosate as a probable carcinogen.
- Independent studies showing glyphosate’s impact on the gut microbiome.
- International examples of countries banning or limiting glyphosate use.
Pro Tip: Include links or document names where possible. Even a brief citation shows you’ve done your homework.
Step 4: Be Respectful, But Firm
Regulators are more likely to take your submission seriously if you’re polite and factual. Avoid aggressive language or accusations. Focus on why the proposal is problematic and how it conflicts with public health priorities.
Example:
“While I understand that trade considerations are important, public health should be the primary factor in determining safe levels of glyphosate residue on food.”
Step 5: Offer Solutions
It’s not enough to just say what’s wrong — suggest what should happen instead.
- Request that the proposal be halted until more independent safety data is available.
- Call for a comprehensive review of glyphosate safety that includes recent research on chronic exposure.
- Advocate for alternative weed management strategies that do not compromise food safety.
These solutions show that you’re not just opposing something — you’re offering a path forward.
Step 6: Sign Off With Impact
End with a strong closing statement that reaffirms your stance.
Example:
“I believe that increasing glyphosate residue limits is not in the best interest of public health or environmental safety. I urge the Ministry for Primary Industries to reject this proposal and prioritize long-term safety over short-term convenience.”
Sign your name, include your location, and add your contact information if applicable.
Bonus: Double-Check Before Sending
Proofread your submission. A few minutes spent on spelling and grammar can make your message appear more credible and professional.
If you’re comfortable sharing your submission publicly, consider posting it on social media to encourage others to take action as well.
Final Thought
Submitting your feedback doesn’t have to be daunting. A clear, concise, and personal message is more likely to resonate than a long, complicated one. Your voice matters — and when enough people speak up, it’s harder to ignore.
So, take a few minutes to craft your submission. Make it count.
When regulators keep moving the safety bar to accommodate industry practices, it’s not science guiding policy — it’s convenience. We owe it to ourselves to question where the real safety lies.
– No More Glyphosate NZ
Helpful Resources for Your Submission
Backing up your submission with credible references makes it more powerful. Here are some resources that can help you make a strong case:
World Health Organization (WHO) – Glyphosate Classification
The WHO classified glyphosate as a “probable human carcinogen” in 2015.
Read the IARC Monograph
New Zealand Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) – Glyphosate in Food
Official guidelines on acceptable glyphosate residue levels in food.
Visit MPI’s Glyphosate Page
It’s time to rethink chemical exposures — ‘safe’ levels are doing damage: Study” – Environmental Health News
This article challenges the conventional idea that low-dose chemical exposures are harmless, highlighting new research that shows even “safe” levels can disrupt biological processes.
Read it here: It’s time to rethink chemical exposures —“safe” levels are doing damage
Submission Template
Subject: Submission – Opposition to Proposed Glyphosate MRL Increases
I’m writing to oppose the proposed increase in glyphosate Maximum Residue Levels (MRLs) for food crops in New Zealand.
I do not support raising the limits from 0.1 mg/kg to 6–10 mg/kg for wheat, oats, barley, and field peas.
This proposal:
- Puts public health at greater risk
- Undermines food safety and trust in our regulatory system
- Threatens soil health, biodiversity, and long-term sustainability
- Disadvantages organic and regenerative farmers
- Damages New Zealand’s international reputation as a clean, green food producer
As a [parent / consumer / farmer / health worker / citizen], I believe we should be working to reduce chemical residues in food, not raise the limits to suit current usage.
Please do not proceed with this change.
Keep me informed of the consultation outcome.
Kind regards,
[Your Name]
[Your City or Region]
This is just a template!
Feel free to personalise it — add your own reason, share why this matters to you, or adapt the wording to reflect your voice.
Every submission counts, but unique messages stand out more.
Personalise it — your voice matters!
Image Source & Attribution
We’re grateful to the talented photographers and designers whose work enhances our content. The feature image on this page is by kkolosov. You can find more of their work on 123rf.com.
