We Think About What We Eat — But What About What We Wear?
Could your clothes be exposing you to glyphosate? From cotton fields to fabric, this overlooked risk deserves more attention.
When “Science” Becomes Spin: How the Glyphosate Narrative Gets Shaped
What happens when “the science” isn’t the full story? This article breaks down how industry messaging shapes public understanding of glyphosate-based weedkillers — and why New Zealanders are asking sharper questions.
Prove It in Court, Not in Parliament: The Case Against Glyphosate Immunity
Bayer tried to secure legal immunity for Roundup cancer lawsuits in Missouri — and failed. The courts upheld a US$611 million verdict, setting a powerful precedent. As New Zealand debates glyphosate residue limits and regulatory oversight, the lesson is clear: accountability shouldn’t be optional.
Glyphosate Hazardous by Law — But Roundup’s Ingredients Stay Hidden
Glyphosate is legally classified as a Hazardous Substance, yet most of Roundup’s ingredients remain secret. Europe now requires full disclosure — so why doesn’t New Zealand?
Acute vs. Accumulated: Why Do We Regulate Tutin in Honey — But Not Glyphosate
Tutin in honey can trigger seizures — so NZ enforces strict limits and testing. Glyphosate? It’s in everyday food, yet quietly accepted. Why the double standard?
What’s Actually Being Tested? The Hidden Loophole in Chemical Approvals
We assume new chemicals are tested for safety — but in most cases, only one ingredient is tested, not the full spray. Is our system protecting us — or industry?
Regulators Don’t Test Commercial Formulations — What That Means for NZ
Most pesticide safety tests ignore the real-world spray. A new study reveals regulators don’t test the full formulation — just the declared ingredient. What does that mean for New Zealand’s food system, public health, and global credibility?
Roundup and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: What the Science (and the Courts) Are Saying
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma sits at the heart of the glyphosate debate — and the science, lawsuits, and billion-dollar settlements are painting a picture regulators can no longer ignore. Here’s what the research (and the courts) are saying about Roundup and cancer risk.
Glyphosate vs Roundup: Why This Distinction Matters — Even Ministers Get It Wrong
We asked why glyphosate‑based weedkillers sold in NZ don’t carry clearer health warnings. The Minister replied — but she answered a different question entirely.
Beyond the Withdrawal: What Comes (and What Doesn’t) After Glyphosate
As Bayer signals a retreat from glyphosate, the scramble to replace it is already underway. But many of the new “solutions” look a lot like old mistakes. Is New Zealand prepared — or just rebranding the same broken system?
Glyphosate keeps radiata pine profitable — but at what cost to health and environment?
Forestry in New Zealand leans heavily on glyphosate-based sprays such as Roundup Renew and Roundup Transorb. Promoted as efficient, these chemical cocktails expose workers, neighbours, and ecosystems to risks regulators prefer not to see.
The Spray Spin: A Closer Look at Alan Emerson’s Glyphosate Claims
When a local columnist praises glyphosate as an environmental hero and dismisses health concerns as “hysteria,” it’s time to dig deeper. Here’s our response — with facts, court cases, and real-world testing.
“No Health Risk”? What MPI Didn’t Explain About Glyphosate Limits
MPI decided not to raise glyphosate limits on key cereals — but still insists the higher limits would have been “safe.” With glyphosate already showing up in real supermarket foods at today’s levels, we ask: where is the evidence behind that confidence, and what principle is actually guiding these decisions?
How Icafolin Herbicide Works—And Why It’s Not Just Another Glyphosate
Icafolin is being promoted as the “next glyphosate,” but its biology, risks, and real-world impact tell a different story. Here’s what sets it apart—and why it matters for New Zealand.
The Reforms That Never Landed: When Chemical Oversight Became a Policy Missed Opportunity
The PCE made clear recommendations to improve how New Zealand tracks the fate of chemicals — including a national pollutant register and changes to regulatory assessments. Yet those reforms have still not been delivered. This article explores how policy momentum stalled, and why it matters.
The Hidden Gaps: What Consultants Found About Chemical Monitoring in NZ
Underneath the PCE’s 2022 report sit consultant papers that reveal just how fragmented New Zealand’s chemical monitoring really is. Different regions measure different contaminants, making it difficult to track environmental fate — and helping explain why glyphosate can slip through the cracks.
The Warning We Ignored: What the PCE Told Us About Chemical Monitoring in NZ
We assume New Zealand is tracking the chemicals we use — but is that really happening?
This article is part of a 3-article mini-series exploring...
Glyphosate in New Zealand Soils: What the Massey Research Reveals
Massey University soil research shows glyphosate doesn’t always stay put. Under certain NZ soil conditions it can move, stress clover and soil microbes, and potentially leach. What does this mean for farming and water protection?
Ten Years of Delay: How MPI Failed to Deliver on Its Glyphosate Promise
In 2015/16, MPI promised to reassess glyphosate’s pre-harvest use after finding wheat residues above legal limits. Nearly ten years later, that promise remains unfulfilled — and instead of tighter safeguards, New Zealand faces proposals to raise allowable residues.
Grazing After Spraying: How Is This Still Happening?
A supporter’s photo of cows grazing yellowing grass after spraying has raised big questions. It’s not just about residues — it’s about what no one is watching.
Stop the Chemical Creep!
