HomeHealth RisksThe Unseen Dangers: Are Contractors Risking Their Health by Not Wearing the...

The Unseen Dangers: Are Contractors Risking Their Health by Not Wearing the Right Gear?

We’ve all seen it — you’re driving past a roadside, or walking through a council reserve, and there’s someone out there with a spray wand in hand, mist drifting everywhere.

And more often than not, they’re wearing… what? A T-shirt and a cheap blue surgical mask? Maybe sunglasses if it’s sunny?

Every time I see it, I think the same thing: How on earth is this considered “safe practice”?

Because if a flimsy mask was barely good enough for a virus, what makes anyone believe it’s enough for a chemical designed to kill plants?

Surgical Masks vs Glyphosate-Based Weedkillers: Why They Don’t Protect You

We all learned during COVID-19 that surgical masks were never meant to stop tiny airborne particles. They don’t seal. They leave gaps. They let air in around the sides.

So here’s the uncomfortable question:
If a surgical mask can’t reliably stop a virus, how is it supposed to protect someone from glyphosate-based weedkillers like Roundup — especially when it’s being sprayed directly into the air they’re breathing?

It can’t. Because it wasn’t designed to.

Sprays like Roundup don’t just produce droplets; they can create fine aerosols and vapours that linger. And anything airborne has a funny way of going straight where you don’t want it to go: eyes, nose, throat, lungs.

Glyphosate Inhalation: The Overlooked Exposure Route

One thing I’ve learned watching this issue closely is that people underestimate inhalation. We talk a lot about skin contact, gloves, overalls — and yes, that matters — but breathing something in is a whole different level of exposure. See our investigation into glyphosate residue pathway.

And remember:
Glyphosate-based formulations aren’t just glyphosate.
They’re mixed with surfactants designed to penetrate surfaces — plant surfaces, soil surfaces… and human ones too.

Contractors spraying without proper gear inhale tiny droplets and vapours they can’t see, can’t smell, and can’t avoid once they’re in the air. It builds up day after day, season after season. Silent exposure is still exposure.

And the research isn’t ambiguous. We’re seeing more evidence pointing to:

  • respiratory irritation
  • endocrine disruption
  • kidney and liver effects
  • oxidative stress
  • possible cancer links

But the people most exposed are often the least informed — or the least protected.

Learn more in our deep dive on glyphosate and hormone disruption.

Why PPE Guidelines for Glyphosate Still Ignore Respirators

This one still baffles me.

Pick up almost any glyphosate product label and you’ll find a list of PPE: gloves, coveralls, boots, goggles.
But masks? Respirators? Anything to protect the lungs?

Almost always missing.

Even the EPA guidelines — which should be the gold standard — don’t clearly say, “Wear a respirator.”

Why?
Is it an oversight? An assumption? Or something no one wants to say out loud because it raises uncomfortable questions about inhalation risk?

It’s very hard not to notice the pattern:
If you don’t formally acknowledge a risk, you don’t have to deal with it.
And you certainly don’t have to explain it to the people using the product.

Recommended PPE for Spraying Glyphosate-Based Herbicides

Short answer: a lot more than what we usually see.

If you’re spraying glyphosate-based weedkillers, “better than nothing” isn’t good enough. Experts consistently recommend:

  • A proper respirator — at least an N95; ideally a half-face or full-face respirator with pesticide-rated cartridges
  • Chemical-resistant gloves
  • Goggles or a face shield
  • Overalls
  • Closed, chemical-resistant footwear

Put bluntly: Surgical masks are theatre. Respirators are protection.

How Inadequate Safety Advice Puts Contractors at Risk

This is the question no one seems to want to answer.

Is it training?
Is it cost-cutting?
Is it contractors being told the chemicals are “safe enough” not to worry?
Or is it the long-standing habit of downplaying any risk that isn’t immediately visible?

Whatever the reason, it leaves workers carrying the burden. Not managers. Not manufacturers. Not regulators.

And that should worry all of us.

Because the person holding the spray wand deserves better than “She’ll be right.”

Using Glyphosate Weedkillers at Home? Protect Your Lungs

Maybe you’re a contractor. Maybe you’re a homeowner clearing a driveway.

Either way:

Your lungs are worth more than a $1.20 mask from the supermarket.

Even if glyphosate-based weedkillers were “safe when used as directed” (a phrase that feels increasingly hollow), inhalation is still a direct exposure route. And exposure adds up.

Wear the right gear. Push your employer to provide proper PPE. Question outdated assumptions. Protect yourself the way you’d want your kids or partner to be protected.

Because the industry won’t do it for you.
And the regulator hasn’t required it.
So for now — it falls to you.

Manufacturer Safety Instructions for Glyphosate Products

Every glyphosate label includes at least some version of this:

  • Read the label
  • Wear gloves, boots, overalls
  • Avoid spraying when windy
  • Keep it out of waterways
  • Store safely
  • Dispose of containers properly

These are the basics. But basics don’t protect lungs.

If you want to dig deeper, many labels used to be available online — including Ravensdown and Orion AgriScience — but some pages have quietly disappeared. That alone should give us pause.

Why Proper PPE for Glyphosate Spraying Matters More Than Ever

Spraying chemicals without proper respiratory protection isn’t just unsafe — it’s unnecessary. The technology exists. The gear exists. The knowledge exists. What’s missing is the will to require it.

And until that changes, the responsibility falls on every contractor, every groundskeeper, every homeowner who picks up a glyphosate-based product.

Protect yourself.
Ask questions.
Don’t let convenience win over common sense.

Your health is worth more than someone else’s shortcuts.


Further Reading and Resources

For those interested in diving deeper into the topic of glyphosate safety and the potential health impacts of exposure, check out the following resources:

Glyphosate Safety and Label Instructions – Ravensdown: Basic product summary only; no full label or safety sheet provided.
Visit the Product page

Glyphosate 360 Label – Orion AgriScience:
Detailed precautions and safety measures.
View the Label

EPA Guidance on Glyphosate Use:
Find out how to safely use glyphosate in the garden. Safety protocols and best practices (which do not mention the use of respiratory protection at all).
EPA New Zealand

Staying informed and questioning industry norms is key to making safer choices. Equip yourself with knowledge and protect your health.


Image Source & Attribution

We’re grateful to the talented photographers and designers whose work enhances our content. The feature image on this page is by bogdanhoda. You can find more of their work here: https://www.123rf.com/profile_bogdanhoda.

No More Glyphosate NZ
No More Glyphosate NZ
No More Glyphosate NZ is an independent, community-funded project focused on transparency around glyphosate use, residues, and regulation in New Zealand. We investigate how pesticides, food production, and policy decisions affect public health and consumer clarity — so New Zealanders can make informed choices in a system that often hides the detail.
Stop the Chemical Creep! spot_img

Popular posts

My favorites